Grace Emerges

Showing posts with label homosexuality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label homosexuality. Show all posts

Saturday, May 5, 2012

Hello Evangelicals!

Hello mainstream evangelical Christians. 


You may be considering Progressive Christian (also called Emergent, Emerging, postmodern, or even heretical!) ideas yourself or wondering what they're all about. This article is to help bridge the gap, maybe provide some indication of where Progressive is different. Answer some questions.  Hope it helps!


My mission: bridge the gap and light the way!


I've been doing some research on the topic, and at the risk of gross over-generalizations on both sides, here are some ways that Progressive is different:


  1. Progressive seems like "anything goes" when it comes to basic theology.  This can be disconcerting!  But the reason why is that Progressive is about freedom to reconsider the nature of God in a way that is not prescribed by tradition and history.  Thinking for ourselves.  The way we understand, God is mysterious and cannot be pinned down with a systematic approach.  I think Progressive takes a more generous stance on any versions of belief in God and Jesus.  I do hear a lot of faith in the revelation of God from Progressives, not just vague mystery.  In other words, the role of the Holy Spirit and God-revealed truth is even more important for many Progressives.  But we're open to listening to even the most far-out ideas, without flinching, and without withholding love for that person.  At the same time, truth and theology are of huge importance to Progressives and are a continual hot topic of conversation.  This conversation is very Bible-based and seeks to discern the author intent, historical context, and what truth today can be gleaned from scripture.  So it's not really "anything goes" with respect to truth -- it's just that our view of God is a subject of open and continuing revelation -- not written in stone for all time.
  2. The reason this is possible, is that Progressive does not see a person's mental framework of beliefs and ideals (a person's "statement of faith") as being a gateway to finding God, to participating in the kingdom of God, or to meeting God in heaven.  What you believe is not a test, leading to a pass or fail grade.  Isn't this the unpleasant reality of most of our traditional Christian belief systems?: "You have to believe like me, or God won't accept you!".  Progressive discards this view of a picky God when it comes to examination of our faith.  For example, look at how Jesus commended or discarded faith.  If you gather the evidence it says that Jesus was impressed by child-like faith, but also did not require any particular type or amount of faith to accept people.  He even taught in the parable of the sheep and the goats that some people that had faith in Jesus would be on the WRONG track because they never opened their hearts to "the least of these".  Did you ever think about that?  Maybe faith is just "what I think", or "what I currently understand."  It's not a gateway to salvation or God's throne or grace.  Faith is just part of being a Christian. It's descriptive, not a prerequisite.  It's a growth process.  It leads to other things.
  3. Progressive does not mean passive!  Progressive is a bit zealous and in your face about things.  But not about faith itself (see points #1 and #2).  Progressive, like Jesus, tends to speak against the religious establishment because of how that establishment often defies the principles that Jesus tried so hard to teach us.  Principles like compassion, avoiding judgment, turning the other cheek, loving enemies, being peacemakers, replacing all legalism and religious elitism with "Love God.  Love Others."    Accepting sinners while lovingly encouraging them to find a better way to live.  Nine times out of ten (not a literal statistic!) when Jesus judged or criticized anyone in the gospels, it was to criticize people who sought to please God by stomping on others.  Even John the Baptist caught wind of this when the Pharisees came to be baptized.  Look -- we need to stand up for equality and grace.  If we see that people are being stomped on, we are going to be upset!  We are going to stand up for the little guy/girl.  Being a "church" should not be about privilege for those that belong, and exclusion of (or apathy toward) those that do not.  Have you ever heard someone say "I'm not prejudiced"?  ANYONE who says that is deluded.  We're all prejudiced.  We all have trouble seeing our fellow person as equals.  When we do notice the inequality, we need to stand up and do something about it.
  4. Progressive has different priorities.  Because of the diminished priority of "right beliefs", Progressive focuses on the priority of compassion.  When Jesus taught about the least of these, and the poor in spirit, etc., and when James talks about true religion being to care for "widows and orphans", Progressive sees this as the highest calling.  The Great Commission should be to spread THIS MESSAGE to the whole world  (and to act on it!), not the message that people need to believe a certain thing.  The kingdom of God, which John the Baptist and then Jesus declared, is an ever-growing kingdom of God's goodness reigning on Earth.  The Lord's Prayer is a prayer that God's kingdom would become reality and engulf us all.  The Great Commission is a call to carry the kingdom to the ends of the Earth.  The priority is not to indoctrinate - it is to liberate through love.
  5. Different perspective about sin.  Because of this change-up of priorities, Progressive puts a much higher priority on sins like Apathy, Inequality and Hatred than on, for instance, Sexual Sins.  Where Jesus was super clear on Apathy and Hatred, he had nothing at all to say about homosexuality, and little to say about anything else sexual.  The "sinfulness" of certain sexual behaviors is usually self-evident.  Marital unfaithfulness, child molestation, even pornography are vices that have clearly destructive effects.  That's why these things are wrong.  On the other hand, God is not offended by our sexuality.  God made us this way, and we should never use sexual morality as AN EXCUSE for discrimination or hatred.  Quick example: a man who cheats on his wife criticizes a homosexual, even to the point of making him/her feel unloved and ostracized.  Who is the sinner in that situation?  Come on Christians -- be rational and fair.  If it's wrong to judge and hate, then why do we gloss over that and then get incensed about homosexuality?  For the record, I will never tell a homosexual that he/she is sinning because of preference for a certain gender.  I don't get that.  I won't tell a transgender person that hates the body they were born in that they should just get over it. I haven't been there, and I don't know what it's like. Regardless of your view on this, however, look at the log in your own eye before picking on someone's gender preference!
  6. Speaking of different perspectives about sin and priorities, Progressives see negligence of the poor as a SIN!  Hunger, lack of medical care, tendency toward exploitation, no access to education or economic betterment, these are the most grievous sins of our age -- We, the church can organize ourselves to do something about it.  If we move away from other focus areas, we can work to make the world a better place.  Period!  Have you ever heard of social justice?  Have you ever heard of human trafficking?  What about institutionalized gender discrimination?  Do these things matter to you?  If so, maybe you're a Progressive in the making.
  7. Grace.  Progressive simplifies the meaning of grace to be God's unconditional outpouring of love on the undeserving.  It doesn't lead to the usual traditional contradiction, which goes something like this: "The Messiah came to save you, to free you from chains, to open the doors to your prison cell.  Now, God is so upset with you that if you refuse this one-time offer to be liberated, then forget it!  You're doomed and God will 'Unfriend' you for all eternity."  No, Grace is more like a Parent's love for his/her child.  The parent knows the child will screw up.  He/she expects it.  When the child does, maybe the parent is angry, but doesn't kick the kid out on the street and lock the door.  What kind of psychotic parent do we think that God is?  Why are we okay with contradiction?  Contradiction that says "I believe in Grace as God's unconditional love for me.  But I believe in Grace as God's doom for someone else."  Come-on.  Due to point #2 above, we can believe in a more gracious and generous Grace.  A Grace that's really Grace.  We can move past living with contradiction and believing in a God with a toxic personality.  Did Jesus ever display a toxic personality?  Didn't he exemplify Grace, in a way that really no one has ever been able to criticize?  There then.  Act like Jesus.  Believe in a God that acts like Jesus.

As I said, I hope this helps.  If you have questions, email me at GraceEmerges@gmail.com and I'll provide references, scriptures, emotional support, whatever.  I'm also eager to revise my explanation and understanding if someone wants to set me straight!


If you want to read a lot more, look around at the archive of blog posts on this site (GraceEmerges.blogspot.com) and over on Facebook at Open Church Initiative.  I provide all kinds of expositions on Progressive.  If there's anything I can do to bridge the gap from traditional evangelicalism to Progressive -- I'm all about that.  Drop me a line.  Any may you find Freedom and Joy in your faith!

by Brad Duncan






Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Forward Progress 4: The Good News of Grace




Forward Progress: 
Lessons and Trends in Progressive Christian Faith
by Brad Duncan

A 6-part series on the church, faith and theology,
and how they can move forward into the next generation. 


The Good News of Grace



There's something wrong with our view of the cross when it provides incomplete grace to us and teaches us to treat others with incomplete grace.

Are we saved by our faith, our adherence to a particular set of ideals and beliefs?  Or are we saved by right behavior that comes from our faith?  Are we saved by belonging to the right group, qualifying us as God's children?  Are we saved by correctness, by carrying a certain truth?

No, grace is the whole story.  Complete grace.

In the past three articles I have covered a lot of ground, and hopefully these next three articles may be much shorter since the long-winded points have already been covered.  In particular I discussed the notion that grace can be defined as unconditional love, which leads us to a new gospel, a new good news that eradicates judgment.

I also talked about the human condition.  After all, what is grace if not in the context of human failure?  We wouldn't really call that grace.  Love, freedom, hope, faith, and grace only make sense in our context of weakness, failure, and incompleteness.

Where does this leave us?  How do we actually live with grace?  What do we say about the cross?  How did the cross provide and demonstrate grace?  What is grace in the context of human failure and unconditional love from God?  What kind of faith does that produce, what type of right behavior?

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Dear Pastor, Please Invite the Gay

by Brad Duncan
Dear Pastor,

Please invite the gay crowd to our church.  Please invite the LGBT people.  Please do it soon, and with no reservation. Please love the gay crowd and welcome them.  Don't make their sexuality an issue at all, or withhold acceptance from them, don't criticize or hold back your friendship.  Don't talk to them about sin instead of grace.  Just invite them.

Please don't delay or discuss it in committee.  Time is running out.

Dear Pastor, do it for us, before our hearts grow cold and hard.  Do it so that we can remember the dank stink that grows in our hearts from the seed of hate.  Do it before we can't love anymore.

Do it before we start to think that sitting in judgment makes us good, makes us better, makes us receive salvation.  Do it before we forget about grace altogether.

As long as we can love to hate a class of people for their lifestyle, we can believe that we are somehow saved by ours.  Maybe we think we are saved by our straightness, our lack of accepting the gay crowd?  Did we already forget about the blood of Christ and about grace?  Have we already turned stale?  Do we think we're actually ON God's side by not inviting them?  Or are we against him?

Dear Pastor, the gay crowd is not going to corrupt our children, or convince us to be promiscuous or unfaithful.  The gay crowd is not going to make us love sin or the devil.  The gay crowd is not going to make us love God less.  The gay crowd will not diminish our worship, or reduce our appreciation for the Bible.  The gay crowd is not contagious or repellent.

No, dear Pastor, the gay crowd will melt our hearts. For if we can open our hearts to those we have formerly hated with no cause at all and no harm or threat to us, because we don't like their non-straight lifestyle, if we can repent and actually love them, then maybe our dead hearts can live again, our cold hard hearts can melt and love again.

No the gay crowd has something we don't -- acceptance of differences.  Let's hope they can accept us now after all this time, and find room in their hearts for forgiveness of our sins.  Let's try to repair the damage.  Time is running out.

The gay crowd needs God exactly as we do, and the gay crowd can love God exactly as we do.  Are they believers, like us?  Isn't that up to them what they believe, and not up to us?  Do they believe that Christ died for them?  Who are we to object?

Please invite them, before it's too late.   Not too late for them -- too late for us.
 23"So if you are offering your gift at the altar and remember there that another believer has something against you, 24leave your gift at the altar. First go away and make peace with that person. Then come back and offer your gift. (Matthew 5:23,24, God's Word)




Related Posts:

Thursday, August 11, 2011

Any Other Word?

Any other word.

I challenge anyone to support either a theology or logical rationale for the rejection of LGBT people by the church.  Consider the following arguments for rejecting gay people.  Would the rationale make sense if we used any other word besides “gay”?


This article was also featured on theOOZE at:  http://theooze.com/culture/replace-gay-with-any-other-word/

Rationale #1: Being gay is a sin.  The Bible says it’s wrong.  Therefore, a gay person cannot be a Christian.
Replace gay with:
  • unkind, judgmental, selfish, greedy, hateful, jealous, lustful 
  • drug-addicted or alcoholic 
  • elitist, over-ambitious, self-absorbed, egotistical 
  • <fill in your top 10 sins here> 
  • human!
Replace gay with any other word and the rationale doesn’t hold up.  Can you think of any other word where this argument makes sense?  If you say that sinners cannot be Christians, then there are no Christians.

Rationale #2: Being gay is a choice.  Therefore, a gay person cannot be a Christian. 
Again, replace gay or “a gay person” with:
  • Republican, Democrat 
  • Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, monk, hermit 
  • pro-choice, pro-life 
  • homeless, jobless, hungry
  • in debt, debt-free 
  • an engineer, a doctor, a masseuse, a travel agent 
  • a prostitute, a loan shark, a bank robber, an axe-murderer
The only words that make any sense in this sentence would be “non-Christian” or something similar that implies the person is not a Christian (e.g., Muslim, atheist, etc.).  A person that chooses not to be a Christian, is NOT a Christian.  That’s it! 

You can define “being a Christian” in various ways (having faith in Jesus and the Bible, being accepted by God, liking Christian traditions, whatever) and there’s no other choice you could make that would disqualify you from being a Christian.  We believe that a person makes a choice for faith, and that its a free gift from God, right?  Certainly an “axe-murderer” would most likely not agree with Christian ideals but we could have a long, heated theological debate about whether the axe-murderer could be accepted by God in the end if he tried to be an axe-murdering Christian.  Probably the axe-murderer would get a better deal from Christians than the gay person in most circles!  Not sure about the pro-choice person -- I suppose that could be a close tie with being gay.

Rationale #3:  Gay people are just born that way.  Therefore, a gay person cannot be a Christian. 
Replace gay with:
  • blond-haired, brown-haired, brown-eyed, blue-eyed 
  • short, tall, fat, skinny 
  • white, black, Hispanic, <fill in your ethnicity or nationality here> 
  • physically handicapped, mentally handicapped, mentally ill, child with a birth defect or disease 
  • introverted, extroverted, <fill in your personality traits here> 
  • smart, dumb, <fill in your intelligence level here!> 
  • upper-class, lower-class, <fill in your economic status here!> 
  • male, female, human !
The argument about whether gay people are born gay or choose a life-style of homosexuality is irrelevant to faith or being a Christian.  If only certain classes of people can be Christians, then being Christian is not a choice at all! 


How about this one:


Rationale #4:  I don’t like gay people.  Therefore, a gay person cannot be a Christian. 
You get the point.  Doesn’t work with that word or any other word either.  But it’s probably the most honest statement of all.

I have heard these arguments all my life, and blindly accepted them.  But do we ever stop to question whether the argument itself makes any sense?  What’s the sense in arguing something when the logic is flawed to begin with.  In that type of argument, we will always lose!  

It’s like when my 8-year old boy argues with me as to why he should be able to eat candy for breakfast.  He’s convinced, but his logic is laughable!  I would be embarrassed to support an irrational point that everyone else can see as laughable.  It makes Christians look ignorant!  Can’t we hear our own words and tell when they don’t make sense?

In the end it just doesn't matter if we like it, or agree with it, or think its a sin or a life-style -- the rationale of rejection just doesn't work.  It's better to just call it hate.

So, once again, I challenge anyone to find a rationale for rejecting LGBT people.  Can you think of anything that doesn’t fall apart if you replace “gay” with any other word?  

If you can’t think of one, then maybe an apology would be a better choice.  We have hated gay people long enough, and they don’t deserve it.  What’s worse: being hateful, or being gay?  If they can't be Christians, then maybe we’re not Christians, either.


Bradley D. 


Related Posts:
Hello Evangelicals!

Dear Pastor, Please Invite the Gay
A Letter to the Unaccepted
Forward Progress 4: The Good News of Grace